top of page
Search
tromettherbacarme

The Ultimate List of Management Scientist Software For Mac in 2023



If you are a Mac user, you know the struggle of finding software for your computer. Although there are many project viewers out there, like Merlin Project, I want to dedicate this space to project management software for Mac and highlight the ones that have a native desktop app.


Having said that, most of the tools on this list are online platforms for which you only need a browser and an internet connection, rather than a Mac or PC. Therefore, it comes down to what you specifically need or want from your project management software. You travel a lot - choose native apps with offline access. Always at the office - any software on this list will do.




Management Scientist Software For Mac




Why I picked Wrike: Its simple interface enables users to switch between Kanban boards, one-click Gantt charts, and traditional workload views, allowing them to choose how to visualize their priorities. Wrike also features task lists, subtasks, calendars, shared workflows, and file sharing. Unlock advanced insights with performance reporting tools, resource management and allocation, time tracking, and more.


Features include pre-built templates, custom request forms, interactive Gantt charts, visual proofing, workflow automations, time tracking, project portfolio management, and dashboards.


Integrations include 400+ pre-built native integrations, including integrations with the most popular file management tools from Adobe Creative Cloud, Google, and Dropbox, along with sales and marketing software from Salesforce and Marketo.


Collaboration capabilities within the software include in-app chat, mentions, and all the standard features found on a software of this calibre. Additionally, it offers forms to collect information from your clients, as well as a digital whiteboard and collaborative documents you can use to connect your team.


Smartsheet has useful project management features such as workflow automation and visualization of tasks in Gantt, calendar and card views. Team members get notified of critical changes in real time, and the tool provides shared views, detail history, activity logs, automated alerts, reminders, and status reports to keep everyone aligned and informed. The Critical Path feature highlights all the tasks which directly impact your project completion date to keep an eye on important milestones. Reporting is a strong feature of this tool, with editable summary reports that you can easily export to Excel.


Celoxis is one of the few project manager software programs to be available both in SaaS and on-premise flavors. SaaS costs $22.50/user/month (annually) and on-premise costs $450/user one-time. Both require a minimum 5-user sign-up and come with 30-day free trial.


Task management features include task checklists, subtasks, and task templates, as well as the ability to filter, sort, search for, easily reorder, and view tasks in the manner most convenient for the team. Users can also create Gantt charts, calendars, and timelines to visualize tasks.


Zoho Projects is an award-winning project management and collaboration tool from Zoho. It offers flexibility and customizations to suit the needs of traditional project managers as well as agile teams.


Height is a project management software that works on Mac devices and includes an iPhone app. Its simple and intuitive design allows you to easily track and manage your projects from start to finish. You can create and share project plans, monitor progress, and collaborate with team members using their built-in messaging system.


Why I picked Project Online: This cloud-based version can be used on any device, using a web browser. Therefore, after many years of suffering the effects of compatibility, Mac users can finally access this software. It provides built-in templates and familiar scheduling tools for anyone who has used Microsoft software before.


Microsoft Project is a proven product in the market, with features that can scale as the company grows. Hence, you will find the basic task management features, like a Gantt chart view, and robust functionalities, such as portfolio management and demand planning.


Integrations include anything from the Microsoft software ecosystem, Power BI, Wrike, Celoxis, WorkOtter, Zoho Projects, Easy Projects, GanttPro, Premier, GamePlan, Replicon TimeBill, Meisterplan, Intellect, Genius Project, RationalPlan, Projectplace, and many more.


Projects Online, much like other Microsoft software solution packages, tends to be on the pricey side of things compared to other apps available on the current market. Therefore, make sure you do your math before making the investment.


Hive is a robust tool for project management, collaboration, and flexible task management. Users can organize projects in a Gantt chart, Kanban board, table, or calendar, and easily switch between each layout. Updates are reflected across all project views so your whole team stays informed on project updates.


Their service team provides dedicated onboarding in order to get you up and running, and all customer support is unlimited, ongoing, and included in your subscription cost. If you have account-related questions, or would like to review specific features, the customer success team can assist you over the phone, by email, or via scheduled webinars customized to your needs. Their website also includes a help center, and there are detailed help files included within the software itself.


Why I picked Nutcache: This software supplies the standard Gantt chart tools, so you can visually track and organize your tasks with drag-drop-and-click editing techniques that are easy to pick up with minimal training. You can also use the software for Agile or Scrum project management, depending on team preferences.


Along with these project management capabilities, Yanado also includes lots of useful email and task management features. For example, to-do lists are pretty easy to create, plus you can also create tasks directly from emails. Another great feature is the shared inboxes, which allow you to share and assign emails and then manage them like tasks from your inbox.


Features include task and list templates, collaboration tools such as mentions and shared tasks, team management, custom automated workflows, and reports that you can run by members or teams.


While MS Project is incompatible with MacOS, you still have options for using Microsoft Project on your Mac. Like most Microsoft-designed software, this particular tool was built specifically for Windows devices. However, the Project Online web app comes with Microsoft 365 for Mac, and is a fully functional project management software.


I've also heard about a couple of other smaller software developers who are finding life very tough and it started me thinking about the status of scientific software, after exchanging emails with a number of people in the industry (many thanks for their input) I thought I'd collect a few thoughts on my blog. The first thing I should say is I'm not a programmer, I'm a chemist who does some cut and paste scripting leaning heavily on stackoverflow.


I'm sure that there are many developers who would enjoy starting a scientific software company, they have an interesting scientific insight and a laptop, or have developed software in an academic lab that other scientists like to use. However, the conventional wisdom is that 90% of startups fail link and there are miles of newsprint dedicated to the reasons why startups fail, but the bottom line is I wouldn't expect the scientific software industry to be substantially different from others. However as a user of scientific software I'd like to see small companies given the best chance for success.


I guess the answer is both yes and no, some software, for example reference management, could be aimed at the entire scientific community which would be a reasonably large market. However it is already served by a number commercial and open source products. The challenge here is demonstrate an advantage over the existing products. At the other end of the scale there is highly specialised software used by a small group of scientists, unless that small group is willing to pay a substantial amount it is difficult to see a long term viable model. It may be possible to strike a long term deal with a major Pharma company that provides financial viability, but being reliant on a single major customer does seem to be potentially vulnerable. In addition, there is a growing resistance to such long term commitments. A key factor is round-the-clock support, which is difficult for a small company to offer if they are not running an office on two or three continents. The other issue is visibility, in the post App-store world there are lots of applications clamouring for attention, relying on a viral Twitter campaign is probably not enough.


There is also the issue that some of the large software vendors offer a platform that "does everything", so once you've forked out for it there's a barrier to buying anything else because in one sense you're paying again for something you already have, even if it's not quite as good. In addition, even in the large software vendors you may find there are actually only a handful of developers who really know the code, if they leave then support becomes problematic. You can't replace them with any software developer, they need to have a background in science as well.


I've been asked on several occasions if it possible to make a living supporting open-source software, I think is very tough, simply because people equate Open-source with free. The reality is that implementing open-source solutions can be very challenging and companies probably have to learn this the hard way. Their response is then usually to purchase a commercial product.


I've seen a lot of software published by academic labs and fair amount of the "Hints and Tutorials Pages" are taken up with tips on how to compile/install on Macs. However it seems to me that universities rarely have plans for longer term support, once the post-doc who wrote software leaves or the grant runs out development and support ceases . Some groups Open-Source the code in the hope that users might provide support, in reality this mostly just ends up as "abandonware". This is may not be because the code is not useful, but it is simply because the users are not programmers and lack the skills. Another issue is that the code may well not be documented and also be poorly written. This should not be a surprise though, much software is written solve a particular scientific problem not with the aim of sharing the code and I've never seen a grant proposal that contains funds for long term maintenance and development. 2ff7e9595c


0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page